🎯 Mixture of Experts: Scaling Transformers Efficiently
🏠 Home

🎯 Mixture of Experts (MoE)

Interactive exploration of how MoE scales transformer models efficiently through sparsity, routing, and selective expert activation

🧠 The Core Problem: Dense vs Sparse Computation

🚨 The Scaling Challenge: Traditional transformers use ALL parameters for EVERY token. As models grow, computation becomes prohibitively expensive.

πŸ” Traditional Dense FFN Problem

❌ Dense Approach (Traditional):
Every token β†’ Uses entire FFN β†’ All 11B parameters activated
Token "The" β†’ 11B parameters
Token "cat" β†’ 11B parameters (same ones!)
Token "sat" β†’ 11B parameters (same ones!)

Problem: Massive computational waste for simple tokens!
βœ… Sparse Approach (MoE):
Every token β†’ Routed to specialized experts β†’ Only 2-3 experts activated
Token "The" β†’ Grammar Expert (1.4B params)
Token "cat" β†’ Noun Expert (1.4B params)
Token "complex_math" β†’ Math Expert (1.4B params)

Insight: 8Γ— parameter increase, same computation cost!
🎯 MoE Key Insight: Different tokens need different types of processing. Instead of using one giant FFN, use many specialized smaller FFNs and route tokens to the right experts!

πŸ—οΈ MoE Architecture: From Dense to Sparse

πŸ“ Mathematical Transformation

Dense FFN (Traditional):
FFN(x) = Wβ‚‚ Γ— ReLU(W₁ Γ— x + b₁) + bβ‚‚
Where: W₁ ∈ ℝ^(d_model Γ— d_ff), Wβ‚‚ ∈ ℝ^(d_ff Γ— d_model)

MoE FFN (Sparse):
Router(x) = softmax(x Γ— W_gate) β†’ Select top-k experts
MoE(x) = Ξ£α΅’ gα΅’(x) Γ— Expertα΅’(x) for selected experts
Where: gα΅’(x) = router weight for expert i

🧭 The Router: Smart Token Assignment

🎯 How Routing Works

πŸ”‘ Router's Job: For each token, decide which expert(s) should process it based on the token's learned representation.
Router Mathematics:

1. Compute expert affinities:
logits = token_embedding Γ— W_router
[seq_len Γ— d_model] Γ— [d_model Γ— n_experts] = [seq_len Γ— n_experts]

2. Softmax normalization:
probabilities = softmax(logits)
Ξ£α΅’ probabilities[i] = 1.0

3. Top-k selection:
selected_experts = top_k(probabilities)
routing_weights = renormalize(selected_probabilities)
1.0

πŸ‘₯ Expert Specialization: What Each Expert Learns

πŸŽ“ Emergent Expert Behaviors

πŸ”¬ Research Findings on Expert Specialization:

Expert 0: Articles, determiners ("the", "a", "an")
Expert 1: Common nouns ("cat", "house", "car")
Expert 2: Verbs and actions ("run", "jump", "think")
Expert 3: Numbers and mathematics ("42", "βˆ‘", "∫")
Expert 4: Proper nouns ("Paris", "OpenAI", "Tesla")
Expert 5: Technical/code tokens ("function", "class", "{}")
Expert 6: Emotional/descriptive words ("beautiful", "sad")
Expert 7: Complex reasoning and logic tokens

🧠 Key Insight: Specialization emerges automatically during training!
Grammar Expert
15%
Articles, Prepositions
Noun Expert
12%
Objects, Entities
Verb Expert
10%
Actions, States
Math Expert
8%
Numbers, Equations

⚑ Performance & Efficiency Analysis

πŸ“Š Dense vs MoE Comparison

πŸ“‹ Model Selection: Choose a real model architecture to see exact performance comparisons with realistic MoE scaling.

πŸ’° Cost-Benefit Analysis

🎯 The MoE Trade-off: More parameters, same compute cost, but higher memory requirements and routing overhead.

🎲 Interactive MoE Token Processing

πŸ“ˆ Real-World MoE Models

🏭 Production MoE Architectures